Comments on: Inverted Ibex Released http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/ The distro of the Beast Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:42:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Garry http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-45942 Garry Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:42:12 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-45942 Hi Davy, Your config works really well. Thanks a lot! I've added your css file to the site: http://ubuntusatanic.org/dark-themes.php Thanks for your contribution to the SE community. Hi Davy,

Your config works really well. Thanks a lot!

I’ve added your css file to the site:

http://ubuntusatanic.org/dark-themes.php

Thanks for your contribution to the SE community.

]]> By: Davy Jones http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-45932 Davy Jones Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:13:01 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-45932 Firefox 3 still has problems using the inhuman theme. After months of work I created a fix. I posted my fix in the help forum of this website. Garry you owe me! Firefox 3 still has problems using the inhuman theme. After months of work I created a fix. I posted my fix in the help forum of this website.

Garry you owe me!

]]> By: Black Rose http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-45217 Black Rose Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:14:42 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-45217 Maybe we can discuss and re-build new concept about Satanic, Darkness and Heavy Metal.. Darkness and heavy metal are my fundamental piloshopy of my life... I really2 disappointed to Distrowatch for didn`t put Ubuntu SE on their database, so I think about another concept that more 'progressive' and acceptible, but still has the soul of Darkness and Heavy Metal.. Sincerely... Jeahhh!!!!!!1 Maybe we can discuss and re-build new concept about Satanic, Darkness and Heavy Metal..
Darkness and heavy metal are my fundamental piloshopy of my life…
I really2 disappointed to Distrowatch for didn`t put Ubuntu SE on their database, so I think about another concept that more ‘progressive’ and acceptible, but still has the soul of Darkness and Heavy Metal..
Sincerely…
Jeahhh!!!!!!1

]]> By: Black Rose http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-45216 Black Rose Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:10:18 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-45216 ubuntu SE is the mosr briliant idea that I`ve been known until now... Now I use Ubuntu hardy LTS and install The Satanic Themes on my desktop.. But for now I think about another idea that still on Darkness and Heavy Metal world, I call it Ubuntu Heavy Metal edition,,, I was built some wallpapers and GDM Themes about Heavy Metal themes, such as Metallica, Megadeth, and the others... I just want to say thanks and I feel so gratefull to The Builder of The Ubuntu SE, and I really-really hope that somebody to help me build another (new) edition of Ubuntu : Ubuntu Heavy Metal Edition. Hell jeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 ubuntu SE is the mosr briliant idea that I`ve been known until now…
Now I use Ubuntu hardy LTS and install The Satanic Themes on my desktop..
But for now I think about another idea that still on Darkness and Heavy Metal world, I call it Ubuntu Heavy Metal edition,,,
I was built some wallpapers and GDM Themes about Heavy Metal themes, such as Metallica, Megadeth, and the others…
I just want to say thanks and I feel so gratefull to The Builder of The Ubuntu SE, and I really-really hope that somebody to help me build another (new) edition of Ubuntu : Ubuntu Heavy Metal Edition.
Hell jeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

]]> By: Garry http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-44818 Garry Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:04:23 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-44818 I've checked and I get the same issue with the i386 CD. It must have been a mistake with the build process for that ISO. Strange that you're the only one to spot this! That image has been used may times in the past, so you should be safe to install from it if you wish. Sorry about any trouble it's caused. I’ve checked and I get the same issue with the i386 CD. It must have been a mistake with the build process for that ISO. Strange that you’re the only one to spot this! That image has been used may times in the past, so you should be safe to install from it if you wish.

Sorry about any trouble it’s caused.

]]> By: Alex Sanders http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-44772 Alex Sanders Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:32:26 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-44772 Hiya. I checked both ISOs with the checksums provided on your site: 40f9e8d676df5f7d83fe27d29a1b8682 ubuntusatanic-666.4-amd64.iso 5a322ca977b06f1c2bb81a1b7dbd13ad ubuntusatanic-666.4-i386.iso ... so seems you changed this at some point? I've just confirmed these are still the checksums available at http://ubuntusatanic.org/iso/md5sum-666.4, so looks like something needs updating. If you reworked the ISO, then it is just the checksum on your site. If you didn't, I would mount the ISO and check all files against the md5sum.txt file on the "disc". As I said, the ISO itself checks out fine with the md5 above... just a check of all files when mounted or burned reveals the 5 errors. The Live CD seems to run fine anyway, but I haven't tried an install since I don't want it to fail. Hiya. I checked both ISOs with the checksums provided on your site:

40f9e8d676df5f7d83fe27d29a1b8682 ubuntusatanic-666.4-amd64.iso
5a322ca977b06f1c2bb81a1b7dbd13ad ubuntusatanic-666.4-i386.iso

… so seems you changed this at some point? I’ve just confirmed these are still the checksums available at http://ubuntusatanic.org/iso/md5sum-666.4, so looks like something needs updating. If you reworked the ISO, then it is just the checksum on your site. If you didn’t, I would mount the ISO and check all files against the md5sum.txt file on the “disc”.

As I said, the ISO itself checks out fine with the md5 above… just a check of all files when mounted or burned reveals the 5 errors.

The Live CD seems to run fine anyway, but I haven’t tried an install since I don’t want it to fail.

]]> By: Garry http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-44636 Garry Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:16:41 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-44636 Hi Alex, Sorry, I posted that when very drunk. Note to self: "don't post stupid comments on this site when drunk". OK, as for your problem, I've not heard of anyone else having this issue. Maybe the ISO you downloaded is corrupt. That may explain why the MD5sums don't check out also. Try the following command: cksum ubuntusatanic-666.4-i386.iso You should get: 2954075067 719921152 ubuntusatanic-666.4-i386.iso Hope this helps, Garry. Hi Alex,

Sorry, I posted that when very drunk. Note to self: “don’t post stupid comments on this site when drunk”. OK, as for your problem, I’ve not heard of anyone else having this issue. Maybe the ISO you downloaded is corrupt. That may explain why the MD5sums don’t check out also. Try the following command:

cksum ubuntusatanic-666.4-i386.iso

You should get:
2954075067 719921152 ubuntusatanic-666.4-i386.iso

Hope this helps,
Garry.

]]> By: Alex Sanders http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-44580 Alex Sanders Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:09:24 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-44580 Not sure what you mean there... can you explain? Just recapping that the ISO itself checks out fine, and I am not getting errors burning the 64-bit one (or any other distro), but repeated burning of the 32-bit one keeps giving me the same 5 errors. Exactly the same thing when I just mount the ISO and do a check that way (so obviously isn't a faulty burning issue). Cheers. Not sure what you mean there… can you explain? Just recapping that the ISO itself checks out fine, and I am not getting errors burning the 64-bit one (or any other distro), but repeated burning of the 32-bit one keeps giving me the same 5 errors. Exactly the same thing when I just mount the ISO and do a check that way (so obviously isn’t a faulty burning issue). Cheers.

]]> By: garry http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-44487 garry Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:47:30 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-44487 That was a test. You have failed. That was a test. You have failed.

]]> By: Alex Sanders http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/inverted-ibex-released/#comment-44335 Alex Sanders Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:40:26 +0000 http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/?p=91#comment-44335 Hi. I've got 666.4 in both 32- and 64-bit, and the ISOs have been checked OK with the MD5s, but the 32-bit version (once burned) keeps coming up with the same 5 files that fail the check (the 64-bit version is fine). Since I've now burned a few copies, I have to assume the MD5s are incorrect for the following: ./casper/filesystem.manifest: FAILED ./casper/filesystem.manifest-desktop: FAILED ./casper/initrd.gz: FAILED ./casper/filesystem.squashfs: FAILED ./README.diskdefines: FAILED If you change/update any files in future versions, please be sure to generate a new md5sum.txt for the disc contents before releasing the ISOs. Cheers. Hi. I’ve got 666.4 in both 32- and 64-bit, and the ISOs have been checked OK with the MD5s, but the 32-bit version (once burned) keeps coming up with the same 5 files that fail the check (the 64-bit version is fine). Since I’ve now burned a few copies, I have to assume the MD5s are incorrect for the following:
./casper/filesystem.manifest: FAILED
./casper/filesystem.manifest-desktop: FAILED
./casper/initrd.gz: FAILED
./casper/filesystem.squashfs: FAILED
./README.diskdefines: FAILED
If you change/update any files in future versions, please be sure to generate a new md5sum.txt for the disc contents before releasing the ISOs. Cheers.

]]>